c. wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> comex wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> A Bank is a public contract whose purpose includes facilitating a >>>> means of asset exchange between players. Any party to a contract CAN cause >>>> that >>>> contract to become a Bank without three objections. >>> Which contract? >> Any contract. > > It would probably be interpreted that way, but the wording "that > contract" is confusing.
True, it should probably be something like "A person CAN, without three objections, cause a contract [to which e is party] to become a Bank" (do we need to restrict it to parties?)
