On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > ehird wrote: >> On Tuesday, August 11, 2009, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Elliott Hird wrote: >>>> What is the Bill of Attainder proposal's purpose? >>> To get angry at me for my attempted Grand Poobah scam. >>> >> >> Classy. > > When you try to scam an office, you should expect reprisals, esp. > with the Poobah's high ratio of privilege to duty.
Yeah, but that's how the Rest penalty is more or less balanced; to do a massive win manipulation that resets everyone's caste earns the rests to get you a ways (or without mitigating circumstances) all the way out the door. Maybe add to that removal from one office but all of them... about as classy as throwing a fit of pique and abandoning a case..er.. Anyway, (1) I'm surprised officeholding hasn't been made secured-2, seems like it should be and (2) if this went through would it count as a r101 penalty and block rests? (or vice versa).
