On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> ========================== Equity Case 2623 ==========================
>
> comex - who (dubiously) counts as the CotC when performing
> Justiciar duties - rotated the bench without intending to
> mislead others as to the pointless conceptual games indulged in
> by mistake; furthermore, there hasn't been, to my knowledge, a
> case of two appeals panels trying said action - apparently an
> experiment - beforehand. Indeed, I cannot even find any record
> of em *asking* one to do so!
By the initiator's own admission, e did not envision anything by the
contract. I proto-judge {The parties to (2008-11-22-ehird) SHALL act
to terminate it ASAP.}
Comments?
--
Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
