On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: >> What about >> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2009-July/006753.html >> ? > > That was not an accurate report of Salaries at the time of its > publication. If that counted, I might as well replace all my reports > with "Ribbon Holdings as of some date where I bothered tracking them"
Sorry, but that's b.s. We've always allowed reports to not take account for "things that cross in the mail" or "things that were within the time window of preparing a report." Furthermore, even if we go with your unsupported standard, what you're talking about is an inaccurate report, not "no report." Or do you prefer that we go back and take away salaries for every inaccuracy? It's a moot point here because it's not a salary issue, but that was in fact a reasonably accurate report by any standards, with the only question being whether a CoE/correction is relevant. -G.
