On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 13:59, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: >> I'm actually in the middle of updating my old economic action tracking >> website to track decks, cards, and automate deals. When complete I was >> going to offer the dealing and recordkeeping services to the other >> dealors. Justice deals should be out within a few hours. > > My system was a bit different; its goal was to allow players to deal > cards to themselves (on behalf of the dealer) so they got the cards > immediately upon being owed them. Does it make sense to split services > between dealing and recordkeeping, or did you want to do both? -G. > I'm happy to do it all (dealing and recordkeeping for all decks by contract), make my system available for other dealors (to deal and recordkeep from) or just use it for my portion (deck of Justice). While my system is not presently set up to permit players to deal to themselves (it requires an "earn draw" event to be added to the system for recordkeeping purposes before a draw can be generated) I could likely modify it to do so given a few days time.
BobTHJ
