On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > We decided a while back that "X SHALL Y" implies "X CAN Y". Probably > should be legislated explicitly, though.
Only when a mechanism is specified. -- -c.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report Aaron Goldfein
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report Geoffrey Spear
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report comex
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report Jonatan Kilhamn
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report Sean Hunt
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report comex
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report C-walker
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Pool Report Roger Hicks
