On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 17:46, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> 8. At any time, a nomic may >> nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk >> by announcement. Whenever a nomic >> nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjks, >> they are pledging their unquestioned loyalty to Fookiemyartug and by >> doing so declaring Fookiemyartug and each of its partners to be the >> winners of that nomic. > > The obvious scam failed because non-parties were not bound by its > definition (Fookiemyartug also attempted to apply various internal > changes retroactively, though I forget exactly how that interacted > with anything else). See CFJs 1805a and 1819-21. > IIRC, Fookiemyartug was ruled to have never been a contract (and subsequently a player) since it initially had only myself as the basis. Provision 7 of the contract stated:
7. A person may become party to this agreement with the consent of the partner known as BobTHJ. Becoming a party to this agreement retroactively causes that person to be a party to this agreement since its inception. After being forced to reveal it's membership, comex agreed to join and I attempted to (unsucessfully) argue for Fookiemyartug's personship based on the retroactive provision above. BobTHJ