On 6/23/09 4:12 AM, C-walker wrote: > I've been working on this proposal but I'm not sure what the reaction > would be so I've decided to proto it first. Comments welcome. > > { > > Act on Behalf (AI = 1, II = 2) > [snip]
So, I've been musing on my own version of this: Proposal: Regulating Act-on-Behalf (AI=3) Enact a new Power-3 rule titled "Acting on Behalf" with the following text: Acting on behalf of (syn. send messages on behalf of) a person (the grantor) with a specified message is equivalent to sending a public message authored by the grantor. Acting on behalf of a person is secured, with power threshold 3 for first-class grantors and power threshold 2 for second-class grantors. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, acting on behalf of a person is INVALID if not published. Such publication is INVALID unless it specified the text of the simulated message by: (a) clearly stating the text of a message; (b) clearly specifying an action (the message states the grantor performs the action); or (c) performing by announcement an action defined in a public contract's text to (clearly and unambiguously) include causing the grantor to perform a specific action (the message states the grantor performs the action) Enact a new Power-3 rule titled "Permission to Act on Behalf" with the following text: A person CAN act on behalf of a partnership (if it is a person) as unambiguously permitted by that partnership's text. A person CAN act on behalf of another person when unambiguously permitted by a public contract to which the grantor is a party. If permitted by rules with power at least 1.7, a judge in an equity or criminal case CAN act on behalf of a party or defendant without not more than 5 objections. Some rationales: - Secured at Power 3 because if arbitrary Power 1 act on behalf works, then you have a Power 1 pass-any-democratic proposal scam. - Power=1.7 grant is to not break the current equity case rule. - (c) is to make deposit/withdraw work. - Limited to public contracts and public messages to avoid UNDETERMINED game state. There are some actions which cannot be performed by announcement (e.g. submitting an Enigma puzzle), but I don't think any of them are important enough to allow delegation for. -woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature