coppro wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: >> coppro wrote: >> >>> Benjamin Caplan wrote: >>>> Sean Hunt wrote: >>>>> Ed Murphy wrote: >>>>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544a >>>>> I opine REASSIGN. REMAND would normally be appropriate in this >>>>> situation, however, the case now has an interest index higher than the >>>>> former judge's judicial rank; a reassignment does not seem logical. >>>>> >>>> REASSIGN, because of; clearly, so it follows that and therefore. >>> I transfer a prop from Rodlen to Pavitra because. >>> >>> (note to the ATC: there is a reason here that should be reasonably be >>> inferred. I believe the transfer is successful). >> No, sorry, your reason for choosing Pavitra is reasonably obvious >> but your reason for choosing Rodlen is not. > The reason is that Rodlen was the original judge in the case who > provided the bad arguments.
Which case? Not 2544.
