Ed Murphy wrote: > Proposal: Clarify conditional votes > > Amend Rule 2127 (Conditional Votes) by replacing the first two > paragraphs with this text: > > If a vote on an Agoran decision is submitted conditionally > (e.g. "FOR if <X> is true, otherwise AGAINST"), then the > selected option is evaluated based on the value of the > condition(s) at the end of the voting period, and is > clearly specified if and only if the value of the condition(s) > can be reasonably determined (without circularity or paradox) > from information reasonably available during the voting period. > > I spend Ab to make this distributable.
While you're at it, you might change "during the voting period" so it can't mean "throughout the entire voting period".
