On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Benjamin Caplan<celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting. > > We really need a more explicitly well-ordered ruleset if things like > this need to be spelled out. Rule 2222 says "rules to the contrary > notwithstanding", and that just isn't true. The rules SHOULD NOT contain > falsehoods.
R2019 also says "rules to the contrary notwithstanding". -- -c.
