On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> True, but I don't see how that ties a specific skunk to a specific
> reset. I could honestly see this being interpreted either way, but in
> my estimation one skunk canceling all pending resets seems to make the
> most sense based on the wording of the rule. I'm happy to abide by
> whatever decision a judge makes on the issue, but unless a CFJ is
> called I intend to interpret it this way.
That's fair. I don't intend to call a CFJ on it.
--
Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
