On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Paul VanKoughnett<allisp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein<aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>> I vote PRESENT in the Anarchist election. (This is effective >>> iff my previous attempt was not.) >> >> I CFJ on the following sentence. Murphy cast two votes in the recent >> Anarchist election. >> > > Gratuitous: By R683, an eligible voter submits a ballot (syn. vote by > R2127) by publishing a valid notice indicating which option e selects. > If the first vote was invalid due to not being for an ongoing Agoran > decision, then it is not a vote. If it was valid, then since Murphy's > voting limit on this election is 1, this second one is a vote, again > by R683. I'm fairly sure the rule implies that invalid ballots aren't > ballots at all.
Murphy can vote as many times as e likes on the decision, but only the first one counts.
