On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Charles Walker<charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote: >>> I was just trying to keep the Janitor in work, honest. >>> >>> I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable >>> without objection: >> >> Again, I object. -G. > > I feel this is grossly unfair. I am a new player with very few notes > and intend to gain most my Notes/ new currency of them through > proposals. If I have to pay to get them distributed, then this becomes > almost impossible for me to do with the few Notes I have now. I even > set the II of that proposal to 0, zeroing the number of Notes I could > gain from it anyway. If your intention is to get the economy going > then maybe you could spend some Notes? > > -- > C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
And for an II = 1 proposal, even if you play all your cards right, you couldn't gain more than 1 notes, making the best possible situation breaking even. I am personally very opposed to this new system. Isn't the point of the game to have arbitrary proposals? As it is, the number of proposals (including good proposals) will drop. I know I won't be submitting as many.
