On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 6324 - 6338:
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
>
> 6339 D1 2.0 coppro Execution of Intent-on-Behalf
> 6340 D1 3.0 G. Permission to Ratify
> 6341 D1 2.0 G. s/support/object
> 6342 D1 2.0 Quazie Prop2
> 6343 D1 2.0 coppro They're Proposals Too!
>
> 6339 6340 6341 6342 6343
>
> ais523 A F A P A
> coppro F F P F P
> c-walker A F F F A
> G. A F F F A
> Murphy A F F F A
> Pavitra A F F F A
> Quazie A F F F A
> Rodlen F P F F A
> Tiger P F F F A
> woggle A F A A A
> Wooble A F F A A
>
> AI 2 3 2 2 2
> VI 0.25 *U* 4 4 0
> F/A 2/8 10/0 8/2 8/2 0/10
>
> Quorum 9 9 9 9 9
> Voters 11 11 11 11 11
>
>
> Text of adopted proposals:
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6340 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by G.
> Permission to Ratify
>
> Amend Rule 2202 (Ratification Without Objection) by replacing:
>
> A player SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to use
> Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to
> ratification) incorrect document when a corrected document could
> be produced with reasonable effort.
>
> with:
>
> A player SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to use
> Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to
> ratification) incorrect document when a corrected document could
> be produced with reasonable effort, unless the general nature of
> the document's error and reason for ratifying it is clearly
> and plainly described in the announcement of intent.
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6341 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by G.
> s/support/object
>
> Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing the sentence beginning
> "A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable" with
> the following sentence:
>
> A player CAN flip a specified proposal to Distributable by
> spending 1 Note, or without Objection.
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6342 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Quazie
> Prop2
>
> Create a new rule entitled 'Officer's Proposals' with the following text:
> "Any proposal submitted as part of an officer's duties has its
> Distributability flipped to Distributable upon entering the Proposal
> Pool."
>
Is this automated? It's missing the adopted/rejected symbols to the
left of the proposal numbers.
