2009/6/6 Sean Hunt <[email protected]>:
> Elliott Hird wrote:
>> 2009/6/6 Jonatan Kilhamn <[email protected]>:
>>> I judge TRUE.
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Tiger
>>>
>>
>> I intend to appeal this with two support because SERIOUSLY?
> I support.
>
I really couldn't find any other way of reading that rule that made as
much sense as the one I ruled about. Your alleged office is part of
your alleged identity the way I see it.

-- 
-Tiger

Reply via email to