comex wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Elliott
> Hird<[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2009/6/6 Ed Murphy <[email protected]>:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2548
>>>
>>> ============================== CFJ 2548 ==============================
>>>
>>> Proposal 6335 had the effect of submitting a proposal.
>>>
>>> ========================================================================
>> FALSE; "The following proposal is hereby submitted" would work, but
>> this is far too vague for a proposal's text.
>
> Then did the amendment take place, or was it just entirely too vague?
The amendment still happened; it does not need to be placed in an
entirely clear body of text so long as the amendment is clear.
