On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ========================= Criminal Case 2480 =========================
> Appeal: 2480a
> Decision: REMAND
>
> Judge: Taral
> Judgement: NOT GUILTY
> ========================================================================
I remind the appeals panel in CFJ 2480a ({Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger}) that
they CAN and SHALL destroy the 4 rests I own:
{{{
If a verdict or sentence that led to
the creation of Rests is overruled, remanded, or reassigned, the
Rests are still considered to have been created, but the appeals
panel CAN and SHALL destroy any created Rests by announcement.
}}}
Actually, this obligation was incurred ages ago, but still hasn't been
fulfilled. Annoyingly, the rule forgets to specify a time limit; but I
think there's a decent chance that an NoV against panelists would end up
sticking if they don't destroy the rests, given a warning (like this
one) and a decent opportunity.
--
ais523
