On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 22:33 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 15:13, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2543 > > > > ============================== CFJ 2543 ============================== > > > > The IADoP's report includes the date eir previous report was > > submitted, not the date eir current report is being submitted. > > > > ======================================================================== > > It seems to me (unless someone can provide better evidence) that the > report is submitted at the same time as it is listed, therefore I > judge UNDECIDABLE.
G. judged a similar pair of CFJs UNDECIDABLE a while back, for similar reasons, and it created weeks' worth of appeals chaos. (Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean the judgement here is wrong; the eventually accepted judgement on the CFJs in question (2086/2087) turned out not to address the particular question being asked here.) -- ais523
