On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:10 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 27 May 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> I intend, without member objection, to amend FRContest by replacing
> >> section 6 with this text:
> > 
> > I join this contest.
> > 
> > I'd object to any new rewards unless we add something to reward and/or
> > penalize non-performing judges (I don't think we have such a thing,
> > do we?).  Something like "the judge of a round shall be rewarded
> > Y points for judging, and lose 2Y points when a rule becomes valid
> > by timeout".
> 
> There's already a payout for winning a round, which is usually how you
> get to judge the next round - a few past judges have gone AWOL before
> starting the next round, and been replaced by one-off proposal.  The
> recent situation (a judge going AWOL after starting the round, but
> before judging any rules) does not have much precedent.
It's happened before (ironically, with G. judging); what happens is that
the rules all end up valid by timeout, and the round ends after nobody
posts for a fortnight.

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to