On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/26 comex <com...@gmail.com>: >> I support. I want a precedent in favor of dual-format messages for >> previously stated reasons. (Considering that the text/plain was first, is >> there any mail client where this is an actual problem? Why don't you like >> it ehird?) > > My eyes bled because he chose a small-sized Courier, which makes his > report all but unreadable.
The HTML message does not specify a font size. Gratuitous arguments: The body of the message is as follows: --001e680f0fe097d80c046ad26029 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit IADoP's Office Report Date of last report: Tue, 19 May 09 Date of this report: Tue, 26 May 09 (All times are UTC) ... the rest of the report follows. Only after the plain-text version (and 3 lines of multipart header at the top) is the HTML version. Rule 2143 requires that reports be published in plain text, not *only* in plain text.
