On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Alex Smith wrote: > >> We really really need legislation in the area of act-on-behalf... > > Proto-proto: A claim to act on behalf of another person constitutes > a self-ratifying claim that it is authorized by contract.
I'm not sure ais523 didn't publish those NoVs. Contracts are not omnipotent-- they can only go so far in determining whether a person agrees for another to act on behalf of em. In this case ais523 clearly intended that Murphy could act on behalf of em, even though the contract didn't allow it due to a technicality.
