Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Insulator] Report

[Sean Hunt]

Ed Murphy wrote:
> woggle wrote:
> 
>> The second NoV (which wasn't on 19 May) named the crime correctly. The
>> first did not.
> 
> Does this invalidate CFJ 2537?
> 
No it does not. The second NoV, on May 25, was valid (BobTHJ has yet to
post a notice to that effect though).