On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 14:19 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 11:52 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> [The Justiciar can just submit an opinion when e feels like it, > >> and it's used as the tiebreaker when needed]. > > > > Can you remove the hot-or-cold thing at the same time? This serves a > > similar purpose, has a similar spirit, and will create less undue delay > > on court cases. > > Ok. I also considered giving the justiciar an extra 4 days after the > judgement period closed; that way e could wait to give a judgement > until e knew there was a tie. Do you think that would delay things > too much? -G.
Not necessarily; a tie means that more consideration is required. -- ais523
