On May 15, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Quazie wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, comex <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin
<[email protected]> wrote:
While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to
report
or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of
circularity
would have made it above quorum) is a sign of malice.
The fact that e retracted eir own vote for emself seems like pretty
good evidence e knew it was going to fail quorum by 1 vote.
Perfectly legitimate mini-scam. Blame the rule, not the abuser.
e retracted a while ago, so i feel like its hard to say e knew it was
coming. If the known circularity in coppro->ehrid's votes was fixed
OR OscarMeyr had voted then it would have passed. I think that the
doubling rule needs to be revamped though.
All I can say is I have professional ethics. When I'm bought, I stay
bought.
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
