On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:22 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2528 > > > > ============================== CFJ 2528 ============================== > > > > On or about Sat, 16 May 2009 20:15:44 -0500, Yally resolved the > > Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office. > > > > ======================================================================== > > This is ugly. I cannot see any reason why e would have resolved that > election, /nor any reason that this or any election recently started > ever happened/. This is due to R478 requiring that an action by > announcement be performed by "unambiguously and clearly specifying the > action and announcing that e performs it". Yally did not unambiguously > and clearly specify that e ended was ending the voting period for the > IADoP election, but /no one has, in recent history, ever stated to have > explicitly initiated an election/. > > Further arguments welcome.
Wow, I'm so glad I made the IADoP's report self-ratifying! Also note that if an attempt to resolve an Agoran Decision is unchallenged for a week, its result ratifies as having happened even if the decision itself didn't exist. -- ais523
