Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> CoE: ais523 is not the author of this proposal; e retracted eir
>>> version shortly before I distributed. I believe the precedent is that
>>> it was distributed with no author, although my reading of the current
>>> rules makes it look to me that I'm the author. In either case, it's a
>>> recipe for timing scams.
>> Proposal: Fix Promotion Mistakes (AI=3)
>> {{{
>> In Rule 107, replace
>>
>> An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
>> initiate it publishes a valid notice which sets forth the intent
>> to initiate the decision. This notice is invalid if it lacks
>> any of the following information, and the lack is correctly
>> identified within one week after the notice is published:
>>
>> with
>>
>> An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
>> initiate it publishes a valid notice which sets forth the intent
>> to initiate the decision. This notice must include the following
>> information, and is invalid if it lacks any of this information,
>> or the information is incorrect (and the incorrect information
>> could not constitute a valid alternate method of initiating the
>> decision; this does not include taking other actions implicitly
>> as a part of the Decision's initiation).
>> }}
>>
>> This should clear things up.
>
> It will do precisely the opposite. Validation of notices where no one
> notices an error promptly is an intentional form of quasi-ratification.
Oh, that was an oversight on my part; I'm about to head out, so I'll
submit a fixed proposal later.
