Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I see this proposal not as a way for me to be a jackass, but to reveal a > part of the game as flawed. Scamming is something that is very intricate > in the game, and as a result it should be expected that someone would > submit a proposal like this. Instead of getting angry at the proposal, > change the rules to make the proposal impossible. I don't see how this > scam is different from any other. People don't take well to these sorts of scams. See http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/WalrusScam for a good example of a similar scam that caused much furor and led to the first person ever having Left In A Huff (the scammer, in fact, which is a bit odd).
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Aaron Goldfein
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Domin... Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative D... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislat... Charles Walker
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legi... Jonatan Kilhamn
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legi... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative D... Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Alex Smith
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Elliott Hird
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance Alex Smith