On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:32, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/5 Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com>: >> [...] >> >> 5. (Rating=7, Owner=null) A party CAN perform a Battle Action by >> destroying a number of Maneuvers in eir possession equal to the cost >> of that action (default cost 1 if unspecified). >> >> 6. (Rating=7, Owner=null) Rights and abilities granted by War-rules of >> Rating 5 or above CAN NOT be abridged by War-rules with a Rating lower >> than their own. >> >> [...] >> >> 13. (Rating=3, Owner=null) A party CAN NOT increment or decrement the >> rating of a War-rule if e has done so within the past week. >> [...] >> > > Disclaimer: I think this works but I may have overlooked something. If > this is incorrect, please do not be mislead by it. > > If I have any manouvers, I perform the following battle actions: > I create the following War-rule: > ( > 16: The contestmaster SHALL award all points and transfer all Medals e > can to Tiger as soon as e is allowed and able to do so. > ) > I increment the rating of War-rule 17 three times, to 2. > > Explanation: > The ability to perform battle actions is granted by Wr5, rating=7. > Wr13, rating=3 tries to abridge this ability, but it fails due to > directly conflicting and not claiming precedence over (I don't know if > it had helped) Wr5. If we're still unsure Wr6, rating=7, makes it > clear that one actually CAN perform the battle action of incrementing > a war-rule, period. > > -- > -Tiger > I think this fails, only due to Wooble's re-attempted scam being sent before yours. As a result all War-rules were repealed, and then re-initialized. This would have caused all Maneuvers to be destroyed, preventing you from taking the actions stated here.
BobTHJ
