Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2482
>>
>> =================== CFJ 2482 (Interest Index = 2) ====================
>>
>> The right of participation in the fora (Rule 101) takes
>> precedence over the prohibition against excessive Notices of
>> Violation (Rule 2230).
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> Caller: Murphy
>>
>> Judge: ais523
>> Judgement: TRUE
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> History:
>>
>> Called by Murphy: 02 May 2009 17:01:12 GMT
>> Assigned to comex: 04 May 2009 07:24:52 GMT
>> comex recused: 04 May 2009 12:49:28 GMT
>> Assigned to ais523: 04 May 2009 15:33:38 GMT
>> Judged TRUE by ais523: 04 May 2009 16:39:38 GMT
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> Judge ais523's Arguments:
>>
>> I judge this TRUE; rule 101 has higher Power, so by rule 1482 it does
>> indeed take precedence.
>>
>> At this point, I'd normally answer the question that this case probably
>> meant to ask, which is whether there is a conflict between the two rules
>> such that the precedence relationship actually matters. However, I have
>> a rather obvious conflict of interest concerning this matter, so I won't
>> opine on it in this judgement, and instead I'll CFJ on it.
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>
> I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment due to a conflict
> of interest.
It has already been appealed.
