On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Rodlen <rodlenj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I CfJ on the following statement:
>
> "A proposal that fixes an obvious grammatical error that completely changes
> the meaning of a rule counts as modifying a substantive aspect of the
> meaning of the rule."
>
> Just for clarity.
Gratuitous: Rule 2140 suggests TRUE:
A "substantive" aspect of an instrument is any aspect that
affects the instrument's operation.
However, in my opinion, fixing an error by definition doesn't change
the meaning of anything: a fix that would change the rule to use an
interpretation different from the one already being used to interpret
it is more than just a fix.
