On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:32 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Can someone explain why e doesn't need a lot of support to do this? I
> don't see how the first one is not a "valid, un-closed NoV published
> by the same player earlier that week" as per R2230. Though there has
> to be something as surely somone in that big a scam has to have
> noticed such a flaw.
It's possible to publish an NoV by sending it to a public forum, no
matter what lower-power rules think on the matter. Rules 101 and 478,
both power-3, give us the right of participation in the fora. And
publishing NoVs is certainly a legitimate form of participation (unlike,
e.g. lying).
-- 
ais523

Reply via email to