On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:32 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Can someone explain why e doesn't need a lot of support to do this? I > don't see how the first one is not a "valid, un-closed NoV published > by the same player earlier that week" as per R2230. Though there has > to be something as surely somone in that big a scam has to have > noticed such a flaw. It's possible to publish an NoV by sending it to a public forum, no matter what lower-power rules think on the matter. Rules 101 and 478, both power-3, give us the right of participation in the fora. And publishing NoVs is certainly a legitimate form of participation (unlike, e.g. lying).
-- ais523