On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > Heh, I have a proposal in the pool to achieve more or less exactly the > same effect, at the moment. Mine tries to fix the immediate aftermath of > the scams win, though (restoring the points of players whose points were > unintentionally reset), in addition to providing for future situations.
I was actually going to do that in a separate proposal. I don't like the way yours does it, though; consider what happens if somebody else manages to win by high score by the time it passes. My intent is to figure what the scores should be right now and have the proposal ratify those as of the time of submission. -root
