On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The Anarchist's proposals are rarely accepted. This proposal proposes two >> changes, both of which serve the purpose of having the Anarchist's proposals >> actually be accepted. First, the Anarchist is given the power to select the >> rules e wishes to repeal rather than having to randomly select some (which >> will often net em with having rules that nobody wants to repeal). Second, it >> gives the Anarchist the power to submit other relevant changes, so as not to >> leave the rules in disarray if any of eir proposals are to be accepted. > > As far as I can tell, the Anarchist isn't prohibited from submitting > any proposals e wants. If we don't like proposals of random rule > repeals anymore, we should just get rid of the Anarchist since the > office isn't entertaining us anymore (if it ever did.)
What would be truly entertaining (and needing to be implemented at a high level) would be random but with power-if-adopted set to AI+1 instead of AI. -G.
