On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> Trivially FALSE. comex has a rest, which is a Losing Condition. > E burned it off, I thought?
E had two; I think e has only burned one off so far. >> But I don't think you would get a paradox out of this anyway; it would >> simply not be a Win Announcement, due to not being true. > Claiming it isn't true leads to a contradiction, if you accept that > comex does indeed have such an abnormally high score. The liar's paradox is neither true nor false. A win announcement must be "correct" which cannot be the case if it is not true. This is essentially the same argument I used in judging CFJ 2463. -root
