On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 09:12 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> When a binding inquiry case is eligible for ratification, and it > >> has a judgment of TRUE, any player CAN, by announcement, ratify > >> the Inquiry Statement. When a binding inquiry case is eligible for > >> ratification, and it has a judgment of FALSE, any player CAN, by > >> announcement, ratify the Opposite Statement. > > > > Without objection, please. Ratification is as dangerous as it is useful. > > > > -root > The assignment of the judgment is effectively the intent, and the > appeals period is where people can object. I specifically didn't make it > without objection because that defeats the binding nature of the case.
Obvious scam: two members of an appeal panel colluding to OVERRULE to a judgement that gives them a win. -- ais523
