On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > with this text: > > Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by > announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously > and clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs > it, or that e will perform it at a specified time (an integral > number of seconds after midnight UTC) within one day after the > announcement. Any action performed by sending a message is > performed at the time date-stamped on that message, or at the > specified future time (if any).
I still don't think precedent supports performing future conditional actions this way-- (I have a Note --> I destroy it) may unambiguously translate into either (I destroy a Note) or () if it's generally known whether I have a note at the time of the message, but (I have a note tomorrow --> I destroy it) does not unambiguously and clearly specify any single action.
