On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Proposal: Scheduled actions
This should probably explicitly spell out the order that actions occur in the event multiple actions are scheduled at the same time and the order is significant. Granted this might be a problem even without scheduled actions, but 2 people sending a message manually (or even using cron on different machines) at the exact same time is a lot more unlikely.
