Wooble wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:17 AM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: >> By the way, have we actually been taking quorum into account in >> elections? At the moment an election with more than one option is >> subject to all the usual, including voting period extension and >> failing quorum. > > I certainly wasn't; I missed that change. > > I suspect that every election since P5831 was adopted was closed > illegally, although the resolutions have since self-ratified as have > the IADoP's reports reporting the holders of the offices.
Only those with multiple candidates and few enough votes (quorum has been hovering around 7 for a while). The elimination of the special case was intentional, and pointed out (albeit briefly) in a comment within the proposal: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2008-October/015346.html
