ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:15 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: >> 2009/4/6 Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com>: >>> For entering things, sure, but for being able to analyze purported >>> errors and correct them if needed? Not everyone has their own VCS. >>> >> (git|darcs|hg) is hard, let's go shopping. > > During my previous stint at Notary, I kept a darcs repository of all the > changes to the report. (Not to mention, of course, the intrinsic change > history that comes from posting all reports to email.)
The main advantage I see with a wiki is that it's easy for anyone else to review the change history (I'm sure you could make this possible with $FAVORITE_VCS as well, but probably not as easy). I agree that it doesn't make much difference to the Notary if e's equally familiar with both toolsets.
