On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> 6172 D 1 2.0 Goethe enough again already > AGAINST; arguably this would simply loosen the restrictions on > partnerships, because IIRC there's precedent that in the absence of > rules surrounding the situation, they're persons.
We do have that precedent, but we would also still have R2150, which explicitly says that "A person is an entity defined as such by rules..." -root
