Goethe wrote: > As it wasn't clear from the context, the following is/was my justice's > opinion > on Appeal 2402b: > >> Taral became Guilty in a "standard" manner for lateness at the end of >> March 7, at which time AAA was unarguably a contest. The fact that Taral >> tried (in a standard manner) to make the scorekeepor awards "a little bit >> late" and then got caught in the odd situation as a result might be a >> mitigating factor in sentencing, but not guilt. AFFIRM.
You already moved to OVERTURN to NOT GUILTY early on (and Rule 911 prevents you from superseding it), which then became guaranteed to carry the panel when OscarMeyr agreed with it. I'll catch up again later today and send out the official announcement.
