On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > Taral wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>> Oh, you're right. Taral, how hard would it be to allow overriding >>> the usual Reply-To: by, say, including {{{ Reply-To: ais...@foo.bar }}} >>> somewhere within the first 5 lines of the body? >> >> I dunno. What's the use-case here? > > Allowing ais523 to set Reply-To: (his address) when sending out Enigma > puzzles, and not having the mail server overwrite it with Reply-To: > (a-d). (Is this already possible? I'll set this message's Reply-To > to my own address.) >
Well that makes it through in the X-reply-to header, anyway...