On 2009-03-24, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > coppro wrote: > >> You are not a party to the (currently non-contract) Vote Market II. > > Oh, the perennial problem with the Vote Market was that most proposals > aren't controversial enough for anyone to bother buying votes. This > might be improved if more proposals were Ordinary; I should sit down > and propose de-Powering winning and related stuff. >
Votes just aren't a good currency.
