On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com<ihope127%...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The provision about rests is unnecessary; as the Agora Corporation is a > > second-class person. > > Indeed. Let's make it "Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the > voting limit of Agora Corporation on an ordinary decision is 8, if no > member of its basis possesses any Rests." > > > The Corporation should also have a basis; it seems appropriate for it to > > be the empty set. > > How about making it the singleton set containing only the CEO? > Alternatively, let people join and leave it relatively freely, but > limit the number of AGRA they can own if they're not in it. > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > The point? > > It's yet another of my schemes to give Agora a fungible, liquid, > relatively stable currency. > > --Warrigal > Yeah, I'm sure this isn't a scam...
