OscarMeyr wrote:
> It seems to me (based on a dusty recollection of formal logic) that  
> CANNOT -> SHALL NOT, given that SHALL -> CAN.
No, because SHALL NOT and SHALL are not mutually exclusive. For instance,
it is not true that Hillary Rodham Clinton SHALL NOT register; but it is
also not true that e SHALL register.

-- 
ais523

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to