ais523 wrote: > For an even more stark example of this (which may not be directly > applicable), consider a power-3 rule saying "Players MAY A. Players MAY > B.", and a power-1 rule saying "Players MAY NOT B." In this situation, I > believe that B is illegal (although punishments for it would be for > breaking a power-1 rule); Bing does not break the power-3 rule, but does > break the power-1 rule, and the power-3 rule does not make it legal.
Proto-Proposal: Fix MMI (AI = 3, please) Amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by replacing this text: 5. MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the rule in question. with this text: 5. MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the rules.