On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, comex wrote: > The special case of a simple 'X SHALL do Y by > <mechanism> was established in CFJs 1765 and 1890 to imply the > mechanism, but I'd argue that's just an archaic linguistic shortcut, > not a necessary side-effect of the SHALL.
Sorry, you're right; but the CFJ statement is indeed for cases where it's "X SHALL do Y by mechanism Z"; so as long as we're assuming that the archaic shortcut is functional, it's relevant. -G.
