On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 20:11 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/3/11 Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk>: > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 19:49 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> I agree to this contract. > >> (or is that how you say when you want to join the contest?) > > Yep, that's correct. It isn't a contest yet, just an ordinary contract > > atm; however, it's clearly intended to become a contest, and there's an > > intent to make it into one at the moment. > Does the flipping of contestmaster to someone imply that it's at the > same time made a contest? Should I support if I want that to happen? > Since it's just "without 3 objections" one thinks it would be enough > to not object. Flipping of a contestmaster from 'none' automatically makes something a contest. And although supporting an action without objection is possible, it has no effect. (So people normally just implicitly support such actions by not objecting.)
-- ais523
