On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 16:13 -0400, comex wrote: >> In my opinion, if it had said "all duties", ais523's argument would be >> valid; as it is, I think the best interpretation (considering that 'in >> a timely manner' is located at the end and vaguely defined) is that >> the contestmaster is merely required to perform some duties related to >> the contest-- not necessarily all, but e gets no points if e performed >> no duties even if no duties are required of em. > > What about the admittedly vacuous duty of publishing a null string every > week?
Can you prove that you published the null string for the contest as opposed to for other purposes? ;)
